Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,458 @@
|
||||
Ниже — единая цифровая операционная модель AegisOne Engineering в формате .md.
|
||||
|
||||
Это не просто документация — это “скелет системы”, который можно отдать разработчику, внедрить в Notion/Bitrix/1C/веб-CRM или развернуть как внутренний продукт.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AegisOne Engineering
|
||||
## Unified Digital Operating System (UDOS)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 0. СУТЬ СИСТЕМЫ
|
||||
|
||||
AegisOne UDOS — это единая цифровая система управления инженерной эксплуатацией объектов безопасности.
|
||||
|
||||
Она объединяет:
|
||||
|
||||
- CRM (клиенты и сделки)
|
||||
- SLA (контракты и обслуживание)
|
||||
- KPI инженеров (исполнение)
|
||||
- SHS (здоровье бизнеса)
|
||||
- Финансовую модель
|
||||
- Операционный дашборд
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. АРХИТЕКТУРА СИСТЕМЫ
|
||||
|
||||
┌──────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ LEADS / CRM │
|
||||
└─────────┬────────────┘
|
||||
↓
|
||||
┌──────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ AUDIT SYSTEM │
|
||||
└─────────┬────────────┘
|
||||
↓
|
||||
┌──────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ SLA CONTRACTS │
|
||||
└─────────┬────────────┘
|
||||
↓
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ OPERATIONS (ENGINEERS) │
|
||||
└─────────┬───────────────┬──────────────┘
|
||||
↓ ↓
|
||||
┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ KPI ENGINEERS │ │ INCIDENT SYSTEM │
|
||||
└──────┬───────┘ └─────────┬───────────┘
|
||||
↓ ↓
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ SHS ENGINE │
|
||||
└──────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
↓
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ CEO DASHBOARD │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. CRM СИСТЕМА
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.1 Структура клиента
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
Client {
|
||||
id,
|
||||
company_name,
|
||||
object_type,
|
||||
location,
|
||||
contact_person,
|
||||
decision_maker,
|
||||
number_of_objects,
|
||||
systems: {
|
||||
video: int,
|
||||
access_control: int,
|
||||
fire_alarm: bool,
|
||||
it_infrastructure: bool
|
||||
},
|
||||
current_provider,
|
||||
pain_points[],
|
||||
budget_level,
|
||||
status: [lead, qualified, audit, offer, sla, lost]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
2.2 Воронка CRM
|
||||
|
||||
Lead
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Qualification
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Technical Audit
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Risk Report
|
||||
↓
|
||||
SLA Offer
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Contract
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Active SLA
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
3. AUDIT SYSTEM (ИНЖЕНЕРНЫЙ ВХОД)
|
||||
|
||||
3.1 Формирование Risk Score
|
||||
|
||||
Risk Score =
|
||||
missing_archive (25)
|
||||
+ no_power_backup (20)
|
||||
+ no_regulations (15)
|
||||
+ system_failures (20)
|
||||
+ no_documentation (10)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
3.2 Output аудита
|
||||
|
||||
Audit Report:
|
||||
- Risk Score
|
||||
- System condition
|
||||
- Critical vulnerabilities
|
||||
- SLA recommendation
|
||||
- Cost estimation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
4. SLA СИСТЕМА
|
||||
|
||||
4.1 Формула стоимости
|
||||
|
||||
SLA Price =
|
||||
Base Cost × Object Index × Region Factor × Risk Multiplier
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
4.2 Object Index
|
||||
|
||||
Object Index =
|
||||
(Risk × 0.4)
|
||||
+ (Complexity × 0.3)
|
||||
+ (Infrastructure × 0.2)
|
||||
+ (Service History × 0.1)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
4.3 SLA уровни
|
||||
|
||||
Class Index Description
|
||||
|
||||
A 0–30 simple SLA
|
||||
B 31–60 standard SLA
|
||||
C 61–90 complex SLA
|
||||
D 90+ enterprise SLA
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
4.4 SLA метрики
|
||||
|
||||
Response Time
|
||||
|
||||
Resolution Time
|
||||
|
||||
Uptime %
|
||||
|
||||
Incident Rate
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
5. KPI СИСТЕМА ИНЖЕНЕРОВ
|
||||
|
||||
5.1 Engineer Score
|
||||
|
||||
ES =
|
||||
(0.25 × SLA Compliance)
|
||||
+ (0.20 × Response Time Score)
|
||||
+ (0.20 × Resolution Time Score)
|
||||
+ (0.15 × Diagnosis Accuracy)
|
||||
+ (0.10 × Reopen Rate Score)
|
||||
+ (0.10 × Documentation Quality)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
5.2 KPI метрики
|
||||
|
||||
SLA Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
closed_in_SLA / total_requests
|
||||
|
||||
Reopen Rate
|
||||
|
||||
reopened_requests / total_requests
|
||||
|
||||
Diagnosis Accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
confirmed_faults / found_faults
|
||||
|
||||
Utilization
|
||||
|
||||
working_hours / available_hours
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
5.3 Грейды инженеров
|
||||
|
||||
Score Level
|
||||
|
||||
90–100 Senior
|
||||
80–89 Strong
|
||||
70–79 Middle
|
||||
<70 Junior
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
6. SHS (SYSTEM HEALTH SCORE)
|
||||
|
||||
6.1 Формула SHS
|
||||
|
||||
SHS =
|
||||
(0.22 × SLA Stability)
|
||||
+ (0.18 × Revenue Stability)
|
||||
+ (0.18 × Retention)
|
||||
+ (0.15 × Engineer Performance)
|
||||
+ (0.12 × Incident Stability)
|
||||
+ (0.10 × Sales Flow)
|
||||
+ (0.05 × Operational Efficiency)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
6.2 Интерпретация
|
||||
|
||||
SHS Status
|
||||
|
||||
85–100 Growth
|
||||
70–85 Stable
|
||||
50–70 Risk
|
||||
<50 Crisis
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
6.3 Alert System
|
||||
|
||||
SHS ↓ 5% weekly → Warning
|
||||
|
||||
SHS ↓ 10% → Critical
|
||||
|
||||
Retention drop → Immediate audit trigger
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
7. INCIDENT SYSTEM
|
||||
|
||||
7.1 Incident Classification
|
||||
|
||||
Level Description
|
||||
|
||||
P1 critical system failure
|
||||
P2 partial failure
|
||||
P3 minor issue
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
7.2 Incident Rate
|
||||
|
||||
IR = incidents / number_of_objects
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
7.3 SLA breach tracking
|
||||
|
||||
breach_rate = failed_SLA_cases / total_cases
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
8. FINANCIAL LAYER
|
||||
|
||||
8.1 MRR
|
||||
|
||||
MRR = Σ SLA contracts / 12
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
8.2 Revenue per Engineer
|
||||
|
||||
RPE = SLA Revenue / number_of_engineers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
8.3 Cost per Object
|
||||
|
||||
CPO = total_operational_cost / number_of_objects
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
9. CEO DASHBOARD
|
||||
|
||||
9.1 Main indicators
|
||||
|
||||
SHS (system health)
|
||||
|
||||
MRR (monthly recurring revenue)
|
||||
|
||||
SLA Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
Retention
|
||||
|
||||
Incident Rate
|
||||
|
||||
Engineer Score Avg
|
||||
|
||||
Sales Conversion
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
9.2 Dashboard visualization blocks
|
||||
|
||||
1. SHS Line Chart
|
||||
|
||||
trend over time
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. SLA Heatmap
|
||||
|
||||
engineers vs performance
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. MRR Growth Curve
|
||||
|
||||
monthly recurring revenue
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. Client Retention Funnel
|
||||
|
||||
drop-off points
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. Incident Map
|
||||
|
||||
problematic objects
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6. Engineer Ranking Table
|
||||
|
||||
top/bottom performers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
10. AUTOMATION RULES
|
||||
|
||||
10.1 If SHS drops
|
||||
|
||||
IF SHS < 70:
|
||||
reduce new sales
|
||||
trigger audit cycle
|
||||
reassign engineers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
10.2 If SLA compliance drops
|
||||
|
||||
IF SLA < 90%:
|
||||
freeze non-critical projects
|
||||
increase inspection frequency
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
10.3 If retention drops
|
||||
|
||||
IF retention < 90%:
|
||||
mandatory client audit
|
||||
review engineer assignments
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
11. SYSTEM BEHAVIOR MODEL
|
||||
|
||||
DATA → KPI → SHS → DECISION → ACTION → FEEDBACK LOOP
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
12. STRATEGIC PRINCIPLE
|
||||
|
||||
AegisOne Engineering is not a service company.
|
||||
|
||||
It is:
|
||||
|
||||
> an operating system for managing engineering risk in physical infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
13. END STATE MODEL
|
||||
|
||||
The system evolves into:
|
||||
|
||||
predictive SLA risk detection
|
||||
|
||||
automated pricing
|
||||
|
||||
engineer auto-allocation
|
||||
|
||||
client churn prediction
|
||||
|
||||
MRR forecasting
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
END OF SYSTEM
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Если хочешь следующий уровень, я могу собрать тебе:
|
||||
|
||||
1) визуальный UI дашборда (как он должен выглядеть как продукт)
|
||||
2) структуру базы данных (SQL / 1C / Bitrix schema)
|
||||
3) алгоритм “предикта потери клиента за 14 дней”
|
||||
4) или автоматический генератор КП + SLA из этой системы
|
||||
|
||||
Это уже уровень **enterprise SaaS, а не просто инженерной компании**.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user